Comments on: Grab the APEX Listener http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/10/06/grab-the-apex-listener/ My meandering thoughts about Oracle, Application Express and life in general Mon, 05 Sep 2011 05:48:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Art http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/10/06/grab-the-apex-listener/comment-page-1/#comment-461919 Art Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:17:46 +0000 http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/?p=254#comment-461919 Hi John, I would like to switch to a new listener with tomcat but there is a file upload problem. I've got a working application on apache/embedded listener but with a new listener a file name is not passed to the file upload procedure. Would you know what the issue is?\n\nThanks,\n\nArt Hi John, I would like to switch to a new listener with tomcat but there is a file upload problem. I’ve got a working application on apache/embedded listener but with a new listener a file name is not passed to the file upload procedure. Would you know what the issue is?\n\nThanks,\n\nArt

]]> By: Steve Pence http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/10/06/grab-the-apex-listener/comment-page-1/#comment-460361 Steve Pence Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:58:32 +0000 http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/?p=254#comment-460361 Hi John, Do you know if the new Apex listner will run in Oracle's own OC4J container on the App Server? We are running Apex from the Application Server to get single sign on, OID, etc. Thanks, Steve Hi John,

Do you know if the new Apex listner will run in Oracle’s own OC4J container on the App Server? We are running Apex from the Application Server to get single sign on, OID, etc.

Thanks,
Steve

]]> By: John Scott http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/10/06/grab-the-apex-listener/comment-page-1/#comment-459228 John Scott Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:45:41 +0000 http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/?p=254#comment-459228 Hi Dan, Well since the Listener runs inside Tomcat (in my case) then pretty much all the configuration I could do in the OHS can be done either natively in the Listener itself or as a configuration option in Tomcat. So, if the question is can I see myself switching from the OHS to the Listener, the answer is most definitely 'yes'. John. Hi Dan,

Well since the Listener runs inside Tomcat (in my case) then pretty much all the configuration I could do in the OHS can be done either natively in the Listener itself or as a configuration option in Tomcat.

So, if the question is can I see myself switching from the OHS to the Listener, the answer is most definitely ‘yes’.

John.

]]> By: tony miller http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/10/06/grab-the-apex-listener/comment-page-1/#comment-458070 tony miller Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:58:49 +0000 http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/?p=254#comment-458070 John, I am having a small issue with a portion of your book.. Here is a copy of the post I made in the APEX support forum: Just ran into an issue and need some help with it. A person I work with was using code from John Scott's book (Great Book for APEX!!) and was using the verification e-mail link code, when it started acting up. The e-mail that is sent is to call a procedure in a database package (pkg_auth) procedure is called send_verification_email. We moved his code up to my hosted area on Oracle's site so I could help further. The e-mail is sent properly, but when the link is clicked through, the following error is returned from the server: Bad Request Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand. mod_plsql: /pls/otn/f HTTP-400 Missing '=' in query string or post form The link that is being clicked is: http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/ACT_SOFTWARE.pkg_auth.verify_user?p_user=becky&p_code=D62B94845A5E8A5149CCB391CE53D31B Two parameters being passed are user name and a verification key. I am stumped since we compared his code to what John has in his book and except for changes in e-mail addresses and server information (don't visit apexdemo.com, its a company in Washington state..) it is the same... Thank you, Tony Miller Webster, TX John,
I am having a small issue with a portion of your book..

Here is a copy of the post I made in the APEX support forum:

Just ran into an issue and need some help with it. A person I work with was using code from John Scott’s book (Great Book for APEX!!) and was using the verification e-mail link code, when it started acting up.

The e-mail that is sent is to call a procedure in a database package (pkg_auth) procedure is called send_verification_email. We moved his code up to my hosted area on Oracle’s site so I could help further.

The e-mail is sent properly, but when the link is clicked through, the following error is returned from the server:

Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.

mod_plsql: /pls/otn/f HTTP-400 Missing ‘=’ in query string or post form

The link that is being clicked is:

http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/ACT_SOFTWARE.pkg_auth.verify_user?p_user=becky&p_code=D62B94845A5E8A5149CCB391CE53D31B

Two parameters being passed are user name and a verification key.

I am stumped since we compared his code to what John has in his book and except for changes in e-mail addresses and server information (don’t visit apexdemo.com, its a company in Washington state..) it is the same…

Thank you,

Tony Miller
Webster, TX

]]> By: Dan McGhan http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/2009/10/06/grab-the-apex-listener/comment-page-1/#comment-456663 Dan McGhan Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:39:33 +0000 http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net/?p=254#comment-456663 John, I'm just curious... You said there are lots of reasons you'd use it over the EPG... But what about over Apache? I know you're a big fan of Apache and it's abilities including mod_rewrite and virtual hosts. At the same time, I hear this new listener will have some cool new functionality like direct file uploads... What do you think? John,

I’m just curious… You said there are lots of reasons you’d use it over the EPG… But what about over Apache?

I know you’re a big fan of Apache and it’s abilities including mod_rewrite and virtual hosts. At the same time, I hear this new listener will have some cool new functionality like direct file uploads… What do you think?

]]>